tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-81893357461997792462024-02-02T12:30:03.584-08:00Public Diplomacy and Student ExchangesPossibly the first study of the Fulbright Program to be conducted by someone who isn't affiliated with it in any way...Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.comBlogger145125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-6694392577850701082018-07-10T02:15:00.001-07:002018-07-10T02:15:09.958-07:00New Research BlogI'm coming up to the end of my contract at Leeds, so it feels like a good time to make a fresh start with a new (hopefully more frequently updated) research blog:<br />
<br />
https://exchangediplomacy.wordpress.com<br />
<br />Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-64633835353846793252018-02-09T08:46:00.004-08:002018-02-09T08:46:32.887-08:00The New Crisis of Public CommunicationThis Wednesday we had our department's Jay Blumler Lecture, given this year by Silvio Waisbord of George Washington University. The annual lectures always connect in some way with Professor Blumler's work--in this case, it was a revisiting of his book with Michael Gurevitch, <i>The Crisis in Public Communication</i>. Waisbord's talk explored the current version of populism and its accompanying breakdown in public communication. Although social media has a great deal of potential to act as a public sphere, where users can engage in deliberative democracy, like a virtual Greek forum, that hasn't happened. Instead, there's been a phenomenon of partisan bubbles in which we only talk about politics with like-minded friends & family (with occasional interruptions by an argumentative uncle or former schoolmate, etc.).<br />
<br />
The part that struck me as most interesting was his description of the characteristics of populist communication (or lack thereof)--they see political discussion as a shouting match rather than a rational exchange of ideas, they reject facts and science, and they don't seek consensus. This attitude means they simply don't want to participate in classical "public sphere" forms of deliberation. At the end of the lecture, I was left wondering what we're supposed to do--how do we get Breitbart readers, for example, to engage in fact-based, consensus-seeking discussion with people who read mainstream press sources? How do you get them to see the value in scientific proof and facts? It just reminded me of the phrase, "Facts have a well-known liberal bias", used by political satirist <a href="https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/18/on-the-liberal-bias-of-facts/" target="_blank">Rob Corddry </a>back in 2004 when we didn't even realize how far this trend would go.<br />
<br />
Waisbord encouraged us to look for "virtuous cases"--examples of countries/regions where people <i>do </i>engage in rational, fact-based discussion and reject the populist, anti-fact mentality we've seen recently (Trump, Brexit, Le Pen, Wilders, Duterte, etc.). One example might be Finland, where the fight against "fake news" was featured in this clip from <a href="https://youtu.be/wwAzU5ji-CM" target="_blank">Full Frontal with Samantha Bee</a>. Part of their solution is educating the people on how to be critical consumers of news--everyone from political leaders to school kids is taught how to spot fake news and distinguish it from reliable sources.<br />
<br />
I'm still not 100% convinced that there is a solution to the new crisis of public communication, but education always sounds like our best hope.Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-53130858474904859122017-08-31T03:57:00.002-07:002017-08-31T03:57:42.451-07:00Cruz Ramirez and BelongingWe went to see <i>Cars 3</i> the other day and, much like <i>Inside Out </i>or <i>Toy Story 3</i>, it was very poignant and moving, and it made me think about a range of deep issues--seasons of life, ageing, mentors, believing in yourself, belonging, etc. I've been struggling for years with finding a sense of belonging and direction in academia. On the one hand, it's what I love and what I feel called to do, but on the other hand, I've had many, many times where I've felt that I don't belong, that I'm not good enough, that I don't have the same mental energy that my colleagues seem to have. I worry that I'm not cut out for academia, but then I know I'm not qualified to do much else (with a PhD and no experience in any type of industry...), so I feel a bit stuck in the field that I love. I've spent far too much time reading self-help books and websites and watching inspirational talks--and where has it gotten me? I'm still struggling.<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
This morning I had an interview for a part-time lectureship in my department--basically the same job I've been doing, but now with a proper title of "lecturer" instead of "tutor" and a solid 50% FTE instead of the cobbled-together 10%, raised to 45%, raised to 48% contract I've had for the past 2 years. The panel included one member of staff who I've known for years and who I've always struggled with--I like this person and I admire their work, but I always seem to say something stupid in front of them. Does everybody have a colleague like that? Someone who intimidates them into sounding like an idiot?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
This is where <i>Cars 3</i> comes in. Jackson Storm is a new challenger on the racing scene, and his success has made Lightning McQueen question himself--is he too old, no longer competitive, not cut out for racing anymore? Lightning's sponsor makes him work with a trainer, Cruz Ramirez, who tries to get him back in top form for a high-stakes upcoming race. As their friendship develops, we learn that Cruz wanted to be a racecar, too, but became a trainer because when she tried racing once, she looked around at the other cars and felt like she didn't belong. I won't include any spoilers here--it's a brilliant film & highly recommended--but suffice it to say that this kind of self-doubt really hit home for me. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Leaving the theatre, my first reaction was that it was a brilliant feminist message. Cruz wasn't a love interest, she was a professional, a colleague, a racer--there was no direct reference to her gender. That's true gender equality right there. <a href="https://www.romper.com/p/forget-wonder-woman-this-cars-3-heroine-is-the-feminist-hero-of-the-summer-66370" target="_blank">This piece in Romper</a> did a great job of acknowledging the limitations of a feminist reading of the film, so I won't go into it here. But I do think this message is pretty universal and goes beyond *just* women.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I think every woman, every person of colour, every LGBTQ+ person--everyone who's not a white, Western, Christian, heterosexual, cisgender man--can relate to that feeling of looking around at your colleagues or peers and not feeling good enough, of feeling like you don't belong for whatever reason. Maybe you are a white/Western/Christian/heterosexual/cisgendered man but you grew up poor or in a dysfunctional family and your class and background made you feel like you didn't belong. Maybe there was a particular bully in your life who made you feel that way--your own personal Jackson Storm--or a well-meaning colleague like mine who wasn't a bully but still made you doubt yourself for some strange reason.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
So just as Cruz tells herself, "I am a racer", I'll keep telling myself "I am an academic."</div>
Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-50676268186047643612017-07-24T07:59:00.000-07:002017-07-24T07:59:04.306-07:00Embodied Sociality, aka Down the Pub with MatesThis weekend I read an article that confirmed what I've always suspected: the best intercultural communication takes place amongst friends over drinks.<br />
<br />
International education researchers Kati Tonkin and Chantal Bourgault du Coudray from the University of Western Australia observed a group of Australian study abroad students and their use of a blog that was designed to get them to engage in intercultural learning & peer-learning. There have been a lot of studies looking at study abroad 'best practice'--how we can get students to master foreign languages, to engage in culture learning, to not just treat it as a vacation, etc. This one tested the idea that online interaction could improve students' intercultural learning outcomes. By exposing them to theories of culture-learning in the pre-departure stage and supporting their experience with a guided reflection exercise (including a peer-learning element to the blog), it was thought that students would report better culture learning experiences.<br />
<br />
They found that students didn't really critically engage with the blogs or comment on their peers' blog posts. The much more important factor in terms of culture learning, they found in re-entry interviews with the students, was face-to-face socialisation--namely, social drinking. The Australian students found their German counterparts to have more mature, moderate attitudes towards alcohol consumption--they commented on the lack of drunken violence in Stuttgart, the "mature" attitude of young people towards alcohol (i.e. having a beer while socialising, not just binging on spirits). The authors concluded that "peer learning occurred not online but through embodied interactions in the shared social context of the study abroad experience." (p. 115)<br />
<br />
I loved this article because it's what my friends and I experienced and what I've observed amongst my international students. You can't force students to engage in culture learning--it just happens naturally as a result of these 'embodied social interactions'. It's supported by friendship research on international students, as well (Ward, Bochner and Furnham, 2001). If they don't interact, if they are insular and spend all of their time with compatriots, or alone in the library, they're missing out on culture learning experiences.<br />
<br />
It also confirms what I've seen when I've looked at study abroad blogs. Many years ago, I thought I might analyse study abroad blogs, because I had a colleague who researched blogs in a different subject and it seemed interesting. An initial search and browse around the internet quickly showed me that it would never work as a research project. They are the most neglected blogs--started with good intentions in the pre-departure stage, with enthusiastic on-arrival posts, and then they're seldom (if ever) updated during the rest of the stay. Students are too busy engaging with the host culture to post about it--and that's a good thing, in terms of the culture learning we're trying to analyse.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tonkin, K. and Bourgault du Coudray, C. 2016. Not blogging, drinking: Peer learning, sociality and intercultural learning in study abroad. <i>Journal of Research in International Education.</i> <b>15</b>(2), pp. 106-119.<br />
<br />
Ward, C., Bochner, S., and Furnham, A. 2001. <i>The Psychology of Culture Shock</i>. London: Routledge.Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-71158182241274164182017-06-20T03:59:00.003-07:002017-06-20T04:23:59.336-07:00Implicit Bias and ProgressYesterday I took part in a workshop on implicit (unconscious) bias--it was fascinating & engaging, and I'm so glad I went. The statistics on implicit bias are depressing but so eye-opening. One that jumped out at me was a study that showed how the representation of women authors in an academic journal increased bu 30% after anonymous review was introduced. Implicit bias has been linked to<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/07/data-police-racial-bias" target="_blank"> police killings of unarmed African Americans</a>, <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-bias-hiring-0504-biz-20160503-story.html" target="_blank">discriminatory hiring practices</a>, and even <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/susie-lee/yes-even-online-dating-has-white-privilege_b_9066266.html" target="_blank">online dating racism</a>.<br />
<br />
A recent<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-40124781" target="_blank"> BBC article</a> discusses the debates surrounding implicit bias, without really coming to any solid conclusions, but I think it's a very important concept. The article mentions how Hillary Clinton referred to implicit bias in one of the debates--and that Donald Trump misinterpreted it as her claiming that everybody is racist. That's the kind of rhetoric that gets Trump supporters riled up--they equate the complex concept of implicit bias with simple, ugly racism, and then get defensive when they're told they have implicit biases. Research suggests that 98% of people have implicit biases. It's not the same as racism.<br />
<br />
Obviously, after the workshop, I wanted to check out my biases--I took one on gender and careers and another on age. I had a moderate association of men-careers and women-families, like about 1/3 of people, and a moderate preference of old people over young people, like only 2% of respondents. Harvard's <a href="https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html" target="_blank">Implicit Association Test is here</a>, but bear in mind that knowing what your implicit biases doesn't really address the problem. Research has shown that awareness doesn't improve behavioural outcomes, as you might think it would. The key to making real progress is systemic change--anonymisation of CVs and applications, anonymised marking, diversification of the curriculum, etc.<br />
<br />
I did notice some encouraging signs from the workshop, like the fact that there were a few white guys in the room, and that when asked to brainstorm groups that might be affected by implicit biases, we came up with an impressive range, acknowledging how widespread and important the problem is. It wasn't just women and POC, but those with disabilities, people from lower socioeconomic classes, people with mental health disorders, religious groups, occupations, age (youth and elderly are both subject to implicit bias), etc.<br />
<br />
This morning I came across a great quote that made me think about the progress that's been made--how important it is to understand and appreciate it, and to fiercely protect it from attempts to rollback that progress. It's from M. J. Hardman, a linguistic anthropologist and Emeritus Professor at University of Florida. She also happened to be the first Fulbright student to Peru in 1958, and held a Fulbright lectureship to Bolivia in 1965. She's had an absolutely fascinating career and personal life, and I'm trying to find a place for her in my Fulbright women book chapter edits.<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">"My greatest fear is that the young do not know what it has cost us to open the doors through which they now said. There is always the danger that those doors may close behind them." </span><br />
<br />
(Hardman, M.J., 2013, On the 50th Anniversary of the Publication of The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan, <i>Women and Language, </i><b>36</b>(1), pp. 57-61).Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-88506540671324889872017-06-13T06:51:00.003-07:002017-06-13T06:51:31.537-07:00Future Directions for Higher Education<span style="font-family: inherit;">In my application for HEA fellowship that I finished yesterday (yay!), one of the areas of professional values was "acknowledge the wider context in which higher education operates, recognising the implications for professional practice." I talked about the rise of international recruitment, as that's the area I know best from my research & my work with the University marketing department's International Office. This morning I came across another, more expansive consideration of this context--our society's future HE needs in the new economy. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Former US Ambassador to Australia and Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board chair <a href="http://theconversation.com/former-ambassador-jeffrey-bleich-speaks-on-trump-disruptive-technology-and-the-role-of-education-in-a-changing-economy-73957" target="_blank">Jeffrey Bleich gave this keynote address</a> back in March--it's a bit long but worth the read. He offers a compelling explanation for last year's political shifts (Brexit & Trump, among others), and moves on to describe a broader vision for the future global economy. With regards to higher education specifically, he notes that if people are going to be trained to use current technology, they are also going to need retraining throughout their lives to keep up with the constant technological advancements and changes--especially if they are going to live longer and work longer. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><i><br /></i></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><i>"Universities may become less a way station for youth, than a life-long subscription service, with frequent retrainings."</i></span></span><br />
<br />
I love this concept, not least because I've always loved school and can't imagine anything better than going back to it for the rest of my life. The concept of life-long learning is something my grandfather demonstrated to me from an early age. He loved--and used--the dictionary, thesaurus and encyclopedia. He watched BBC World Service on PBS and listened to Seattle's classical music radio station. He would've loved Wikipedia.<br />
<br />
Bleich's concept aligns with what we're seeing in a lot of people's careers in the modern economy--people don't just do one thing, follow one career path anymore. It's increasingly rare to see someone work for the same company for 40 years. Trump and his supporters think that was a good system, that 40 years of mining was a great career, rather than a cause of black lung disease. I saw <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40163863" target="_blank">an interview</a> where his supporters in Pennsylvania were excited about the new Acosta coal mine. They echoed the same ideas about hope that Bleich mentioned in his addres<span style="font-family: inherit;">s:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="background-color: white;"><i>"We feel like we've been thrown away. Our children don't matter, our grandchildren don't matter. And when Trump mentioned us, that was awesome."</i></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="background-color: white;"><i><br /></i></span></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="background-color: white;">I feel for the coal communities--I've been there, my grandfather grew up in West Virginia, and I get it--but going back to coal mining isn't the solution. This new mine is expected to provide 70-150 jobs--that's not going to restore a community that's been hit by thousands of layoffs. And how long is it going to last? They need long-term, sustainable solutions to their employment problems, not a short-term, partial resurrection of a dead industry.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="background-color: white;">--Investment in green technologies</span></span><br />
--Retraining for green jobs<br />
--Infrastructure (one of the interviewees mentioned their broadband infrastructure, among others)Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-40589177710721165422017-06-06T02:55:00.002-07:002017-06-06T02:55:29.985-07:00I should be writing...<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfIR0tgbuCmnfMPgu_12jIVqEIKB-DHAvVhvWWqVnhD1zvOZyrskOOIbWwBc4ZfsFmjp9URprw16S9GxW8cUmhaIaiTNFUSfvAk2LL7ANZCNkwxLj_XrbhRSZeee4q2EtJVFsTHm5RhNI/s1600/15590197_1891214084433713_8598557109458302566_n.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="318" data-original-width="566" height="179" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhfIR0tgbuCmnfMPgu_12jIVqEIKB-DHAvVhvWWqVnhD1zvOZyrskOOIbWwBc4ZfsFmjp9URprw16S9GxW8cUmhaIaiTNFUSfvAk2LL7ANZCNkwxLj_XrbhRSZeee4q2EtJVFsTHm5RhNI/s320/15590197_1891214084433713_8598557109458302566_n.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
I just had my first staff developmental review and it really was helpful--I wish I'd had one of these during the PhD (although maybe that's what my supervision meetings were supposed to cover...)<br />
<br />
The biggest thing I took away from it is the ubiquitous advice that I should be writing. Not just "write more" but seriously, write for 10 minutes here and there when you get a chance, carry a journal article in your bag to read when you're waiting in a queue, always have a writing task list going, etc. They basically explained that they don't take lunch breaks and they're constantly working and thinking. When I mentioned my teaching workload last term meant I never got anything done, as I was with students 10am-4pm, I could tell that they saw that as 2 hours of wasted time. Why wasn't I writing 9-10am and 4-5pm, when George was still at nursery? Because I was exhausted. Being switched on and student-facing for 6 hours straight is mentally exhausting.<br />
<br />
(actually, even just being around people for 6 hours is pretty exhausting for an introvert)<br />
<br />
They explained the reality of academia to me. They don't do what I do--they don't relax and recharge. They get up early and stay up late to read and write. It's very depressing and it's fuelled my self-doubt even more now.<br />
<br />
I'm going to have a research mentor & try to have some accountability with my writing--weekly check-ins, maybe? This blog hasn't really helped me establish better writing habits--it might work for some people, but I just find it's too easy to ignore it for long stretches of time.<br />
<br />
Trying not to get too depressed about this realisation...at least now I know why I'm failing as an academic. It's because I'm enjoying my life!Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-59942475205009245642017-01-30T07:53:00.002-08:002017-01-30T07:53:28.010-08:00The Fulbright Resolution and American Sovereignty<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;">While all eyes have been on Trump and his executive orders, this House bill proposing that the US should leave the UN hasn't received much attention. </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 20px;"><br /></span></span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeEvQaYp0v2iQkOMrlbdg2HjQL2_0QUjlIqUGGkoXV0coDaVyM_rWtbHClWd1UJ3VV2OC3hSKIoDs2nIVa9V6YEh2maYOSokoIYerC3eMiWjWOJOGsW68eauvLzclzJGHXN-pPMTJp2JQ/s1600/hr193.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeEvQaYp0v2iQkOMrlbdg2HjQL2_0QUjlIqUGGkoXV0coDaVyM_rWtbHClWd1UJ3VV2OC3hSKIoDs2nIVa9V6YEh2maYOSokoIYerC3eMiWjWOJOGsW68eauvLzclzJGHXN-pPMTJp2JQ/s640/hr193.png" width="500" /></a></div>
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 20px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 20px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 20px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 20px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #121212;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;">The bill was introduced by Representative Mike Rogers of Alabama, who's </span><a href="http://yellowhammernews.com/politics-2/wake-brexit-alabama-congressman-wants-u-s-leave-u-n/" style="font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;" target="_blank">been talking about this</a><span style="font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"> proposal since the Brexit vote took place last June. He's also a co-sponsor of the "S</span><span style="font-family: inherit;">top Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act", "Defund Planned Parenthood Act" and "</span></span></span><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">Prohibiting the Usurpation of Bathroom Laws through Independent Choice School Act (PUBLIC School Act) of 2016"--a bill that says federal funding can't be denied to institutions that adhere to anti-transgender bathroom laws--as well as various other bills that you would assume an Alabama Republican would support (pro-gun, pro-flag, anti-abortion, anti-tax, etc.).</span></span><br />
<br />
I was upset but not surprised by the bill. The thing that irks me the most is its use of "sovereignty". The United Nations does not impinge upon the sovereignty of its members. What do they think the UN is? It's very interesting, because sovereignty came up frequently in the rhetoric of the Leave campaign, as well as Trump's campaign. Supporters (of Brexit & Trump alike) talked about "taking our country back"--but from what?<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif; font-size: 20px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><i>"Many talk of being sovereign as if it were like being pregnant: one either is or is not. The truth is more complex. A country can be wholly sovereign yet have little influence. Britain has signed some 700 international treaties that impinge on sovereignty. Although the EU has the biggest impact, others count a lot: membership of NATO, for example, creates an obligation to go to war if another member country is attacked. It can be worth ceding this independence to gain influence."</i> (<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/britain/21695056-talk-taking-back-power-may-be-delusional-more-democracy-not-dreaming-sovereignty" target="_blank">The Economist</a>)</span><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;">Trump has talked about leaving NATO, too, ignoring the fact that the only time Article 5 was invoked was after 9/11--drawing America's European allies into war in Afghanistan. The United States has only benefitted from that particular 'loss of sovereignty'. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;">The other thing that upset me about the bill was the fact that US membership in the UN was part of Senator Fulbright's legacy. The so-called Fulbright Resolution, House Congressional Resolution 25, was introduced by the junior Representative in 1943, just six months into his three decade long Congressional career. It pledged the US to join a postwar international organisation, with the precise form & details of that organisation to-be-determined.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;">In his <a href="http://digitalcollections.uark.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/Fulbright/id/472/rec/40" target="_blank">statement to the House</a>, available online from the University of Arkansas, Representative Fulbright reminded his colleagues of the importance of achieving a lasting peace this time, after having failed to do so in the aftermath of the First World War.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><i>"To do nothing as we did in 1920 will be a decision in favor of international anarchy...All of our experience indicates that it is absolutely necessary that some positive, affirmative action be taken before the fighting is over, if we are to achieve anything of lasting value from this war."</i></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;">It's essentially a commitment to internationalism, as he speaks out strongly against isolationism. The wording and content of the resolution is simple and innocuous, but it's an important statement to the world. It declares that the US is ready and willing to play its part in establishing the postwar world order, not to retreat and isolate itself as it did after the First World War. He kept the wording simple so that debates and disagreements over the details could be avoided at this early stage.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><i>"Let us not forget that it was just such haggling and misunderstandings by the Senate in 1920, by both parties, over reservations and restrictions, many of them of little importance, that led to our renunciation of any responsibility for world order, and in a very real sense prepared the way for the savage total war of today."</i></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #121212; font-family: MiloSerifPro, Palatino, serif;"><span style="background-color: white;"><i><br /></i></span></span>
It's been a tough ten days (it's only been 10 days!) of Trump being in office, with each morning's headlines documenting yet another outrageous executive order or unqualified cabinet member or 'alternative facts' from the new press secretary. It's been absolutely wonderful and affirming to see the resistance, though--from the millions who participated in womens' marches around the world to Greenpeace's Resist banner hanging from a crane above the White House, to the ACLU's legal challenge of the immigration ban and the thousands who are demonstrating against it at airports and in city centres. Tonight there are protests again--even in Leeds--and over 1 million people in the UK have signed a petition against Trump's proposed state visit. I love that people are standing up to the craziness, that the press is not backing down and accepting 'alternative facts'. About an hour ago he called the media "the opposition party" on Twitter. He means it in a derogatory way, but they should embrace it. I prefer the British term, 'her Majesty's loyal opposition'--i.e. the media is loyal to the country, and they are the opposition because of that loyalty. You can be an opposition party in service to the country--and that's just what the US media are doing right now. Let's hope they keep it up!Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-15902559500184863642016-11-10T06:46:00.000-08:002016-11-10T06:46:06.048-08:00Initial Election ThoughtsI was absolutely shocked and devastated by the election results on Tuesday night into Wednesday morning, but now it's clear that we all should have seen it coming. It was Brexit all over again--the same divisive, angry rhetoric on both sides, the same class and race dividing lines, and of course, the same result.<br />
<br />
I've been reading a lot of pieces that try to explain it, try to make sense of what happened, why the pollsters got it wrong again, and what happens next. I don't claim to understand it all, and I'm sure there isn't one single, simple explanation. Class, race and education seem to play a huge part in the new alt-right populist politics. The media tends to focus on the working class, uneducated voters who support Trump and have certain lower socio-economic indicators--even the "Make America Great Again" hat is a class marker--it's a so-called "trucker hat". For Brexit, we saw the same type of media portrayal--voters who lived near closed-down factories and industries, like Stoke or Wales for instance, where there was high unemployment, went for Leave. But in both cases, there was a gap between the media portrayal and the reality as shown in exit polling. The majority of Americans who earned less than $50,000 a year voted for Clinton, and many Brexit supporters were retirees living in rural areas and villages in detached homes--not exactly poor or working class.<br />
<br />
Many people have noted that these two elections have exposed an undercurrent of racism and bigotry in society. In the aftermath of Brexit, there was a spike in hate crimes and in the days leading up to the U.S. election, I feared a repeat of that--no matter who won. There have already been stories circulating on social media about racist and anti-Semitic vandalism, harrassment, verbal abuse, sexual assault, and other forms of hate crimes.<br />
<br />
I'm not quite ready to make peace with this new reality. I'm disappointed that Clinton won the popular vote and lost the electoral college--it's like 2000 Gore v. Bush all over again, but without the Supreme Court decision. I'm going to struggle explaining it to my students. I can't picture Inauguration Day, or a State of the Union address with Trump not just taking part, but playing the starring role. I never watched The Apprentice and I don't want to watch him on C-Span, either.Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-59276440577052133002016-10-28T03:12:00.003-07:002016-10-28T03:12:17.304-07:00Feedback AnxietyAs an early career academic, I don't have much experience with editors' comments, so I haven't developed a thick skin yet. Every little margin note & criticism is deeply painful to read. I agree with their comments, too--I don't challenge them, I just accept that they're right and I'm wrong and my work is crap. It sends me to a very hopeless, demotivated place where I struggle to see how I could possibly revise it again. I don't know what I'm doing. I don't know how I got a PhD. Somebody clearly made a mistake.<div>
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj9lcA_HIXepPg0deYbra2HI3QcY63LdXue6-ZPxa4IEcCsKjxDt-2HVnCJrIT-C4z-lry4KxJ5lv-aulauhgHhMOU4YJnl7XjKJSdHq2LjIxE06TP5QJE5ojKyvMCkT1ajwXXszQY1nFE/s1600/d6a1143f571184db25f94613edd43b40af6d3a629221aba00d9efdcfef5efd84.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="203" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj9lcA_HIXepPg0deYbra2HI3QcY63LdXue6-ZPxa4IEcCsKjxDt-2HVnCJrIT-C4z-lry4KxJ5lv-aulauhgHhMOU4YJnl7XjKJSdHq2LjIxE06TP5QJE5ojKyvMCkT1ajwXXszQY1nFE/s320/d6a1143f571184db25f94613edd43b40af6d3a629221aba00d9efdcfef5efd84.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The trouble is, I've already been feeling like a failure because my contract includes some TA work. I'm still doing the same thing I did when I was a PhD student. I love teaching and I'm extremely grateful to be employed, but it's a constant reminder that I have failed to get a post-doc position or a research assistantship or an entry-level lecturing post...One day I mentioned to Richard that I felt like a failed academic and he reminded me that it's not over yet--my career's just starting, it's too early to label it a failure. That said, the "early career" stage excuse can only cover five or so years. The 'what if's creep in and I panic about never establishing myself. And then I get feedback like this, asking for a total rewrite and I have no time to do it, between teaching and reading (no time for job searching or putting together new proposals). How are other academics managing to do all of this? Do they just never sleep or spend time interacting with other people? Is that what I'm doing wrong?</div>
<div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
At the moment, I'm procrastinating over facing the comments and doing my rewrite of that women & FP chapter...I just wanted to put this out there and reflect on it all before I bury it deep again and move on with life. Does it get easier, this whole publication process? Will I always feel worthless when I read editors' comments? Should I give up on academia and move out to a sheep farm in the Dales?</div>
</div>
Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-64266772341120386352016-10-20T10:25:00.001-07:002016-10-20T13:46:55.606-07:002016 Presidential Debates<div class="MsoNormal">
Now that the final debate is over, I'm ready to comment on
this whole hot mess. It's been a painful thing to watch these debates. They've
been unlike any other debates we've ever seen--the constant interruptions and
talking over each other, candidates not shaking hands at the start and end,
name-calling, etc. We've never had one candidate dominate all three debates
before, either--Clinton has been the clear winner of every debate, while her
predecessors have often performed better in one format or the other, and the
winner is often determined by style over substance. In this election, Clinton
had both. She remained calm and poised, even when Trump raised his voice and
became agitated. She rose above his insults and name-calling, and came back at
him with well-crafted responses that often used his own words against him to
prove her points. She tried to stick to the issues, particularly during the
first debate, before more pressing personal issues arose with more recent
revelations.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Clinton has used the debates very strategically and
masterfully--more than anything else in her campaign, her debate performances
have demonstrated her political skills. She refers to a person to illustrate a
point, as we've seen so many other candidates do (McCain's Joe the Plumber in
2008, David Cameron's '40-year-old black man' in Plymouth in 2010), but it's
not just any old anecdote. It's an interview, press release, viral video and TV
advertisement that are already filmed, edited and ready to launch. Her mention
of Alicia Machado at the first debate was absolutely brilliant--his awful
nicknames for her demonstrated both her opponent's misogynist attitudes towards
women ('Miss Piggy') and his racist stereotyping of Latinas ('Miss
Housekeeping'). It absolutely threw him and got under his skin--not only was he
visibly uncomfortable (asking 'where did you hear this?') at the debate, but he
subsequently spent a week tweeting about it, trying to harm Machado's
reputation and discredit her. Instead, it reinforced the image of him as a bully--an
image that was humorous during the GOP primaries when his target was
"Lyin' Ted" or "Little Marco", but the bully image took on
a much more sinister, more universally repugnant quality when his target became
any woman who's ever struggled with her weight (i.e. 99.9% of women).<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I think the final comments of each candidate at the third
debate really do sum up this whole election campaign. They were asked to keep
it positive, and Clinton, first to give her remarks, did keep it very positive:<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Hillary Clinton: <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>I would like to say to everyone watching tonight that I’m
reaching out to all Americans, Democrats, Republicans and Independents, because
we need everybody to help make our country what it should be. To grow the
economy, to make it fairer. To make it work for everyone. We need your talents,
your skills, your commitment, your energy, your ambition. <o:p></o:p></i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>You know, I’ve been privileged to see the presidency up
close, and I know the awesome responsibility of protecting our country and the
incredible opportunity of working to try to make life better for all of you. I
have made the cause of children and families, really my life’s work — that’s
what my mission will be in the presidency. I will stand up for families against
powerful interests, against corporations. I will do everything I can to make
sure that you have good jobs with rising incomes. That your kids have good
educations from preschool through college. I hope you will give me a
chance to serve as your president.</i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
She doesn't mention Donald Trump at all. She starts by
echoing Obama's 2008 election night promise--'even if you didn't vote for me, I
will be your President, too.' It's a lovely concept and an attempt to heal the
wounds inflicted by this divisive, crazy election cycle. The emphasis on
children and families plays to her strengths as the first female
candidate--women are expected to know what they're talking about when it comes
to children/families, so it lends her credibility (obviously that's all problematic
for gender reasons, but let's ignore that for the sake of political strategy).
It's an appeal to the voters, putting the decision in their hands and
empowering them--"I hope you will give me a chance to serve as your
president"--hope, a chance, to serve.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Trump's comments took the opposite tactic: he stayed on the
attack and kept his tone decidedly negative.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Donald Trump:<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>She’s raising the money from the people she wants to
control. Doesn’t work that way. But when I started this campaign, I started it
very strongly, it’s called Make America Great Again. We’re going to make
America great. We have a depleted military. It has to be helped, it has to be
fixed. We have the greatest people on earth on our military.<o:p></o:p></i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>We don’t take care of our veterans. We take care of illegal
immigrants, people who come into the country illegally, better than we take
care of our vets. That can’t happen. Our policemen and women are disrespected.
We need law and order, but we need justice too. Our inner cities are a
disaster. You get shot walking to the store. They have no education, they have
no jobs. I will do more for African Americans and Latinos than she can ever do
in ten lifetimes.All she’s done is talk to the African Americans and to the
Latinos. But they get the vote and then they come back and say ‘we’ll see you
in four years.’<o:p></o:p></i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>We are going to make America strong again and we are going
to make America great again, and it has to start now. We cannot take four more
years of Barack Obama, and that’s what you get when you get her.</i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
He opens with an accusation, and it's not even particularly
clear what he's accusing her of. He says he'll make America great, then
criticizes the state of the military, veterans affairs, immigration,
"inner cities" (Trumpspeak for areas where minorities live). He says
a Clinton presidency would be four more years of Obama's policies as if that
were a bad thing--his approval rating is currently at its second-term high, so
I don't think the American people will have too much of a problem with that.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
And finally, here's my official prediction. I've left Utah
blank because I think McMullin genuinely could win, which means Utah's
electoral votes go to neither Trump nor Clinton.<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt;">
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.270towin.com/presidential_map_new/maps/OOZpG.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="204" src="https://www.270towin.com/presidential_map_new/maps/OOZpG.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<br /></div>
Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-48529442833388882122016-08-25T09:11:00.002-07:002016-08-25T09:11:27.735-07:00Women and the Fulbright ProgramThis week I submitted my revisions to the organizers of a forthcoming edited volume on Fulbright, based on the papers from last September's Fulbright Legacy conference at the University of Arkansas. My chapter's working title is "Fulbright Women in the Global Intellectual Elite"--it looks at women's contributions as grantees, administrators and as accompanying spouses of Fulbrighters.<br />
<br />
I've got to say, I really enjoyed this one. There were so many stories and examples that I didn't have room to include (and I still went over the word limit...)--women whose time abroad changed their whole life trajectory, who accomplished amazing things, who were the first woman in their various fields. Ruth J. Simmons didn't make it into the final version, but she's definitely going in my book's women section. Her journey is brilliant--daughter of a Texas sharecropper, scholarship student at Dillard University, went on to earn a Masters and a doctorate from Harvard, and became the first African-American President of an Ivy League university. I love having extra material for future projects--this paper gave me about 2k words over the limit to tuck away in my 'leftovers' file!<br />
<br />
I'm always relieved to finish a paper and submit it--hitting that 'send' button makes me feel 10 years younger--and I usually celebrate by taking the rest of the day off. This particular paper, though, has been really inspiring and rekindled my enthusiasm for my book edits. I went straight from sending off the paper to starting a new document and collating all of my new and revised bits and pieces.<br />
<br />
This week I've run into another problem of access, just like I did back in 2011. It's so disheartening to be told that you can't do what you wanted to do, what you envisioned your project would include. It made me feel like my efforts on that particular sub-project had been a waste of time--something I have very little of to begin with these days. It's still up in the air, so I don't know what's going to happen with it, but at the moment it's frustrating and I just feel like I'm being thwarted at every turn: I can't get a job without publications so I try to work on those, and now I'm running into barriers with my publication.<br />
<br />
After venting and having a little pity party, though, I decided to just carry on with whichever other bits I <i>can </i>work on in the meantime. I'm updating my lit review (the trouble with updating a PhD thesis is that I did my lit review in my first year, and a lot more research has been published since 2011...) and rethinking my "theoretical basis" chapter (which I never liked but it was a hoop I had to jump through to get my supervisors' approval...I'm not axing it altogether, though, because I've found some interesting new lit to add to it!).Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-689858818465222092016-08-10T10:38:00.002-07:002016-08-10T10:38:21.430-07:00The Certain Demise of US PD in the (tiny) Hands of a President Trump...<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">I try not to dwell on the possibility of a President Trump too much--it's too painful and our efforts are better spent trying to prevent it from happening, rather than speculating about how horrible it would be. There are so many things to fear about a Trump presidency at home--racism, bigotry, homophobia, Islamophobia, sexism, etc.--that I think the media often ignores all of the scary things he would do overseas. He admires dictators, dismisses our allies in NATO, wants to ban Muslims from entering the US and build a wall on the Mexican border, among other outrageous statements. I have complete faith that the ban and wall are not going to happen, but one thing I'm equally sure of is the demise of U.S. public diplomacy under a President Trump. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">This morning I watched a brief<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFIG8l3TRc8" target="_blank"> interview</a> with Madeleine Albright on MSNBC's Morning Joe. She made some excellent points about his "America First" foreign policy (if you can even call it a proposed "policy"...we haven't seen much in the way of concrete, clearly articulated policy statements coming from his campaign so far...). Secretary Albright pointed out that in the late 1930's, the U.S. was following an "America First" policy then, too--and she reminded us of that policy's disastrous effects on her native Czechoslovakia.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">Tara D. Sonenshine, former Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, wrote a great<a href="http://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/how-donald-trump-making-us-insecure" target="_blank"> piece </a>last month on the USC PD blog & Huffington Post about Trump's recent comments re: NATO.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">"<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 21px;">With careless rhetoric, Donald Trump risks destroying America’s power and credibility around the world at a time when Russian belligerence is high, and when Europe is struggling to contain the spillover from the Syrian war."</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">Since that time, he's only grown more and more outlandish in his statements--asking the Russian (or Chinese, he's not picky) hackers to find Clinton's missing e-mails, which constitutes treason. He's now said he was being 'sarcastic' and 'just joking', but nobody was laughing. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 28px;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 28px;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">"Asked if he was concerned that he was apparently encouraging Russia to spy on an American political party, he added: “It gives me no pause. If Russia or China or any of those country gets those emails, I’ve got to be honest with you, I’d love to see them.”" (<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-accused-of-treason-after-urging-russias-vladimir-putin-to-hack-hillary-clintons-email-a7158976.html" target="_blank">Independent article)</a></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">The way he so casually throws country names around, as if Russia and China are interchangeable, demonstrates just how ignorant, and willfully ignorant, he is about the world. This is not the kind of person who has any interest in public diplomacy. Trump would hate "soft power" because it has the word "soft" in its name. He prefers "strong"--it's one of the most-used adjectives in his 200-word vocabulary. He would see it as a waste of time and money--'Why do you need to talk to foreigners? Who cares what they think of the US? America First!'<br /><br />(Another reason the "America First" line sends shivers down my spine: MP Jo Cox's assassin shouted "Britain First"...that's the kind of simplistic, nationalistic, xenophobic rhetoric we're dealing with here) </span><div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">I want to say I'm confident that he won't win in November. The crazy, offensive things he says and does every day, the high-ranking Republicans refusing to support him--surely he can't win. But the polls are still too close. The latest <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/poll-clinton-leads-trump-226858" target="_blank">Politico poll,</a> taken after both conventions had wrapped up, has Clinton just 6 points ahead, 50% to 44%. After seeing both conventions, hearing both of Michelle Obama's speeches, listening to Chachi and Duck Dynasty vs. Katy Perry and Meryl Streep, watching fear-mongering vs. hope-mongering--only 50% of Americans support Clinton? </span><div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;">How can public diplomacy practitioners explain that one to the world?</span></div>
</div>
Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-81963878609145766702016-08-01T07:19:00.002-07:002016-08-01T07:22:40.412-07:00The Fulbright Program at 70<span style="font-family: inherit;">Today marks the 70th anniversary of the Fulbright Act, the modest little amendment to the 1944 Surplus War Property Act that created America's oldest, largest and best-known educational and cultural exchange program.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The size & scope of the program has grown exponentially. In the first two years after the legislation was passed, exchange agreements were made with only nine countries. This wasn't for other countries' lack of interest in exchanges--the agreements were complicated to negotiate and could only be enacted in countries which held surplus World War II property, the only funding source available for these earliest exchanges. Today, the program is active in more than 160 countries around the world, and is funded by a combination (varying country by </span>country) of U.S. congressional appropriations, domestic private donations, foreign government appropriations and foreign private donations. Participation figures have increased significantly, as well. The number of Fulbright grants went from just 84 in its first year to 4,182 by 1953, a nearly fifty-fold increase. Today, approximately 8,000 grants are awarded each year.<br /><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;">
The context in which these exchanges operate has changed dramatically over the past seventy years. International students are no longer a rarity on the world's campuses. American news, media & consumer products are available nearly everywhere U.S. grantees go. When international students decide to go to the U.S., they have pre-formed ideas about their destination from American pop culture (to a much greater extent than they did in the 1940s and '50s). Among the many other effects of globalization, it has greatly influenced the educational exchange experience.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">This 70th anniversary highlights the need for the history of the Fulbright Program to be updated. Today, I've launched a survey of Fulbright Program administrators around the world, asking for their thoughts on the purpose and impact of the exchange program. Their responses will contribute to my examination of the current state of the program in my forthcoming book. I'm aiming to submit my revisions back to my publisher by the end of the year, so expect further progress updates here on the blog.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">For any Fulbright Program administrators, past or present, who are interested in contributing their thoughts, here is a link to the brief survey:</span><br />
<a class="yiv8755376082OWAAutoLink" href="https://leeds.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/the-fulbright-program-at-70-administrators-views" id="yiv8755376082LPlnk316594" rel="nofollow" style="background: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: #196ad4; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px;" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: inherit;">https://leeds.onlinesurveys.ac.uk/the-fulbright-program-at-70-administrators-views</span></a><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Thank you very much for your interest!</span>Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-12919717239265112232016-07-25T05:49:00.002-07:002016-07-25T05:49:58.181-07:00Hindsight<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 36.0pt; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">The European Union's exchange programme, the <span style="line-height: 107%;">European Action
Scheme for the Mobility of University Students (ERASMUS), has had over 3.3
million participants since its establishment in 1987 (European Commission,
2014). </span></span><span style="text-indent: 36pt;">The programme
offers an interesting contrast with the Fulbright Program. The U.S. has, at times, struggled to balance foreign policy
impacts on the programme with calls to preserve its apolitical, academic
nature. The European Union, on the other hand, created its exchange program
with explicitly political aims. It was part of a greater ‘People’s Europe’
project in the 1980's, created to strengthen public support for integration and
foster a European identity amongst the young people who participated in the
study abroad programme. Most studies have found that ERASMUS students feel more 'European' after the exchange experience, and often go on to internationally-oriented car<span style="font-family: inherit;">eers (</span></span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 107%;">Papatsiba, 2005; </span><span style="line-height: 107%;">Teichler and Janson,
2007; </span><span style="line-height: 107%;">Mitchell, 2012; etc.)</span><span style="text-indent: 36pt;">.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 36.0pt; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="text-indent: 36pt;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 36.0pt; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 36.0pt; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="line-height: 107%;"> </span>In 2010, a surprising<a href="http://eup.sagepub.com/content/11/2/241.abstract" target="_blank"> study </a>found ERASMUS participants reporting lower levels of European
identity at the end of their sojourn. Emmanuel Sigalas, the author from the Austrian Academy of Sciences, offers two potential explanations for
this unexpected result. One possibility is that participants began the sojourn
with a strong European identity, which meant “there is more scope for
deterioration rather than improvement.” (Sigalas, 2010, p. 260). The more
convincing explanation, however, is that the host country may have had a
significant effect: the incoming students in this particular study were in the UK. “It is important to note that incoming students came to
study in one of the most Eurosceptic countries of the EU, where…people are
amongst the least likely in Europe to identify as European.” (ibid., pp.
260-261). </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 36.0pt; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;">Now, the interesting part about this finding, given the Brexit results: four out of the nine UK universities included in the study were
located in places that voted to leave the European Union in the 2016 referendum. This suggests that students may have been exposed to Eurosceptic attit</span>udes
during their sojourn, which could undermine attempts to forge a European
identity. In hindsight, it appears that Sigalas' findings might be explained by the simple fact that his subjects went to places like Keele and Southampton, which voted to leave (69% and 53%, respectively).<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 36.0pt; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 36.0pt; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
On a related note, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/jul/23/erasmus-scheme-exclude-british-students-brexit" target="_blank">The Guardian had a piece</a> on the uncertain post-Brexit future of ERASMUS yesterday. The exchange programme relies on basic EU tenets, free movement of people and capital, to operate across the 27 member states. The UK might join the list of countries outside of the EU that participate in ERASMUS fully: Iceland, Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Norway and Turkey. Alternatively, it might go the way of Switzerland and be a "partner country" not a "programme country" (the long list of partner countries, from Albania to Zimbabwe, have a more limited scope in terms of the types of exchanges that they can host). I'm sure the ERASMUS generation who voted to remain in the EU are hoping for Britain to keep its "partner" status.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 36.0pt; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 36.0pt; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
A couple of interesting bits from the article:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 36.0pt; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "Guardian Text Egyptian Web", Georgia, serif; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
"Ironically, Erasmus has its genesis in the UK: its founding father was Dr. Hywel Ceri Jones, among the early senior British appointments to the EEC, to head its first education and training department. He had worked with Professor Asa Briggs at Britain’s first European Studies department at Sussex University, which inspired the European pilot in 1976, he explained this week: “the idea that the internationalisation of study had to be open to all disciplines, not just languages. So we brought in the scientists, social sciences and arts”.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: "Guardian Text Egyptian Web", Georgia, serif; line-height: 24px; margin-bottom: 1rem; padding: 0px;">
Dr. Ceri Jones, who went on to become Director General for employment and social policy at the European Commission, told the Observer: “Erasmus will still flourish in Europe, but UK universities have been a powerful magnet, because of the English language. I feel bereaved by Brexit, and if it leads to the end of freedom of movement and exclusion of the UK from Erasmus, this would be devastating – a tragedy of staggering proportions for universities throughout the country, for the structured internationalisation of our academic institutions, which is what Erasmus is all about”."</div>
Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-82970179065377257792016-07-20T04:30:00.001-07:002016-07-20T05:55:36.130-07:00CPAC Conference, Brexit and Trump<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcSNNEHUVPkKtY0J6jnEN777lYttcqPixTCepv_aenavJLCl5J0PWDEigGxX2vval7iGsowW-GZ-tg5mxSzM3TYPBQe0lvNOD93e9e8xzO0Lk9cJmjld63uSDHNJPvXbM8N6yNXCJY6ps/s1600/IMG_1666.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="239" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgcSNNEHUVPkKtY0J6jnEN777lYttcqPixTCepv_aenavJLCl5J0PWDEigGxX2vval7iGsowW-GZ-tg5mxSzM3TYPBQe0lvNOD93e9e8xzO0Lk9cJmjld63uSDHNJPvXbM8N6yNXCJY6ps/s320/IMG_1666.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Closing discussion with Lance Bennett and Hendrik Bang</div>
<br />
<br />
For the past two days I've been at a conference at the University of York, marking the launch of their Sociology department's new research centre, the Centre for Political Youth Culture and Communication (<a href="https://www.york.ac.uk/sociology/research/groups/cpac/" target="_blank">CPAC</a>). It was a fantastic conference, with a wide range of studies and approaches from various disciplines. The keynotes were given by stars of political communication--Lance Bennett, Donatella della Porta, and Hendrik Bang. I met some lovely people, including two PhD students from my own department whom I hadn't met before, and had a "small world" encounter with Sabine Lang, whose introductory European Studies course I took at UW about nine years ago now. That class made a big impression on me--confirming that I wanted to do European Studies, sending me to Bath on the Euromasters exchange, and, of course, living in Europe for the past 8 years.<br />
<br />
There was a lot of talk about Brexit at the conference. It's very timely to be discussing youth and political participation, as 75% of 18-25 year olds voted to remain in the EU, while the over 65's voted overwhelmingly to leave (I saw the figure 90% in Hendrik Bang's talk). This division is so sad for the UK, for Europe, and really for the world in general. We still don't know exactly what's going to happen, or when--to be fair, it's only been 3 weeks tomorrow, it just feels like longer! It was clear that all of the experts there--from political science, sociology, political communication, etc.--were all very concerned about the future.<br />
<br />
There was also a lot of talk about Trump, speaking of concern--this week's Republican National Convention is a train wreck. So awful, but we can't look away. You can clearly see how divided the party is, and how those in charge are trying their best to just soldier on, regardless of how they feel about Trump. His 60 Minutes interview with Mike Pence demonstrated that Trump really is the narcissistic, bigoted playground bully we thought he was. He barely let the man get a word in--Penn and Teller have a more equitable relationship. Melania Trump's (speech writers') plagiarism of Michelle Obama's 2008 DNC speech is a symptom of a larger problem--they clearly just don't know what they're doing. They need handlers, political strategists--where's their Karl Rove? But the truth is, they're not getting that kind of support for two reasons:<br />
1) Bullies don't ask for, nor accept, help.<br />
2) the RNC doesn't want him to win. They know he's dangerous for the party, the country, the world, and they're not going to help him.<br />
<br />
Both Brexit and Trump have vitally important public diplomacy implications. The world watched the referendum and they're watching the US, too. Britain's reputation will suffer over this. As John Oliver said, after showing a clip of a racist UKIP-affiliated woman, not everything sounds smarter in a British accent. The pound is weaker, there's been a rise in hate crime and some universities have already seen a <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/jul/12/uk-scientists-dropped-from-eu-projects-because-of-post-brexit-funding-fears?CMP=share_btn_tw" target="_blank">decrease</a> in internationally collaborative projects due to fears of Brexit's impact on funding. European students are <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-36799951" target="_blank">already</a> pulling out of UK universities. These instant, detrimental impacts on UK academia show why everyone at the conference was so worried--even the Australians, Brazilians and Americans I spoke with, who are already non-EU, are worried, because we know it's a global issue.<br />
<br />
America's global reputation is already suffering with Trump as a candidate--and the public diplomacy fallout of a Trump presidency would be far worse. It's also suffering because of America's gun culture. As a British woman said to me yesterday, why can't they do anything to sort it? "They" includes President Obama, the 535 members of Congress, the American people through grassroots organisations--anybody. Why can't anybody do anything--"anything" being universal background checks, preventing felons and domestic abusers and 'no fly list' people from getting guns, banning assault weapons--anything. When the news about The United States is always another shooting victim(s)--be it a black man, a police officer, a gay man or a first grader--and nobody does anything to keep it from happening again, that doesn't look good to the rest of the world. If you want to "Make America Great Again", passing some common sense gun control legislation would be a great place to start.<br />
<br />
I'd like to close with something more positive, but to be fair, the conference closed with a talk from Hendrik Bang on political participation"After Brexit", and it wasn't all that optimistic. I suppose there is hope, though, in the fact that the youth DO want international cooperation, and DO believe in the EU's motto, Unity in Diversity. This generation, and the future leaders who are currently growing developing in it, will support a very different agenda to that of their grandparents.Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-63630701935050170972016-06-18T10:11:00.000-07:002016-06-18T10:11:14.816-07:00Two Years OnToday's been two years since my viva.<br />
<br />
On the one hand, some days I feel like an absolute failure because I'm not employed full-time yet and I haven't published my dissertation yet, and I only have two journal articles published (and they're not even in top journals). I look at jobs.ac.uk and beat myself up for not being qualified to apply for anything. My mind goes to a dark place and I regret doing the PhD--I tell myself it was a waste of time, I have over $200k in debt and I can't even find a job. I look at George, my only accomplishment of the past 2 years, and think it was all pointless. I spend most of my days reading Dr. Seuss instead of being Dr. Bettie.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, I've got the "Dr." title and they can't take that away from me. My hard work and $200k+ has bought me the right to use that title, even if I never work again for the rest of my life. I've got a manuscript under revision for publication and a couple of working papers for future journal articles (and they'll be sent to top journals, too!). I occasionally see posts to apply for and they ignite that fire inside me again. They get me excited about research proposals and they make me dream about relocating and new possibilities. I look at George and think how cool it is for him to grow up with academic parents. I love spending my days having picnic lunches with him on the University quad, taking photos of him with red brick backdrops, reading journal articles with him snuggled up against me sleeping.<br />
<br />
Two whole years/only two years...Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-9291765845492728192016-05-20T08:35:00.000-07:002016-05-20T08:35:00.149-07:00What working from home really looks like...<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjV-jX2yOFOIu0HamB9-_WHPgd9z2WqBuzJS0aPDYGr-FdX3DKuPF1vaeangswU0H2h3zPb70lSUAPbv4QjlwVZ4WRX9WnQA4qaykzbgjz7Oj8zRP3E6xK2XPOCTnZHU8YfwvSCJtrY1UY/s1600/20+May+2016+16%253A19%253A25.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjV-jX2yOFOIu0HamB9-_WHPgd9z2WqBuzJS0aPDYGr-FdX3DKuPF1vaeangswU0H2h3zPb70lSUAPbv4QjlwVZ4WRX9WnQA4qaykzbgjz7Oj8zRP3E6xK2XPOCTnZHU8YfwvSCJtrY1UY/s320/20+May+2016+16%253A19%253A25.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
The baby's sleeping on me in the Ergo, leaving my hands free to type and the cat is sat on the side of the laptop. She'll ignore me all day until I try to get some work done...</div>
<br />
Today I had a working from home breakthrough: I left the baby to play on the floor by himself while I answered a few emails. Yes, he pulled all of the contents of the shelving unit out and yes, he put a lot of inedible things in his mouth, but amazingly, nothing was broken or damaged. It was just messy, and for once I just let him make a mess instead of trying to clean up after him constantly (which is futile). And even though I feared that I might be neglecting him, George was having a great time--he's not as needy as I assumed. When I was done with my emails, I tidied up and we went for a walk. I was able to enjoy spending time with him more now that I had a zero inbox and nothing hanging over my head.<br />
<br />
I'm loving this age--he's finally able to entertain himself for a bit. He's sleeping better now, too, which means I'm sleeping better and am finally able to think again. We're only up once in the night now, around 4 am, which still sounds horrible but trust me, it's a huge improvement. I'm starting to feel a little bit optimistic about getting back to writing again.<br />
<br />
Now if I can just get the cat to stop sitting on my notes...Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-20536127604699452812016-04-11T07:29:00.003-07:002016-04-11T07:29:41.430-07:002016 Primaries...View from BritainI've had a few people ask me recently for my thoughts on Trump and the primaries in general.<br />
<br />
The US 2016 Presidential Election is shaping up to be a fascinating train wreck. The Republicans started the primaries with a massive field of candidates, some with serious credentials and some hard to take seriously. The early debates, with over a dozen participants, were fun to watch and laugh at, at first. Behind the late night TV jokes, though, there is the chilling reality that these candidates actually believe the outrageous things they say, and some (very few but vocal) Americans actually agree with them. Bigotry, homophobia, Islamophobia, racism, sexism, ableism, anti-immigration...Even though Donald Trump is the most visible bigot of the group, he's not the only one with these ideas. Other candidates who aren't getting as much coverage have similarly offensive positions. Ted Cruz wants to build a wall, end funding for Planned Parenthood, believes in an "America-first foreign policy" and has defended the Second Amendment in Supreme Court cases as an attorney. I'm with Lindsey Graham, who said choosing between Trump and Cruz is like choosing between being shot or poisoned.<br />
<br />
The Democrats started with just Hillary Clinton--the one we didn't pick in 2008, but she got the consolation prize of being Secretary of State and having the chance to run again in 2016. I'm 100% certain that she thought she would just walk to the DNC this summer and accept the nomination. She must be so irritated by Bernie Sanders' success. At the moment, she still leads in the delegate count and she may still get the nomination--but it certainly hasn't been the easy journey she expected. Bernie Sanders is hugely popular with the kids, the hipsters and the Democrats Abroad. He's a Democratic Socialist, and many Americans abroad know what it's like to live in places with the types of programs he's proposing, like universal healthcare and free tuition. We know how his ideas work in practice--we know that they can and do work, and that they're not just the rantings of a crazy old man.<br />
<br />
At the moment, I'm not ready to make any precise predictions, but I will say this: whether it's Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders against either Donald Trump or Ted Cruz, I genuinely think the Democrats are going to win. The U.S. economy is doing well--unemployment is half of what it was when Obama took office, gas prices are less than half of what they were then, and I saw a headline the other day saying the economy is like it was in the boom times of 1998/99 under Bill Clinton. When the economy is doing well, the incumbents win. Also, the GOP is increasingly divided, with a lot of animosity directed to both Trump and Cruz. Neither of them are going to get enough support to win in the general election. I'm nervous but cautiously optimistic about November...Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-81283620735135241782016-03-07T07:54:00.003-08:002016-03-07T07:55:27.461-08:00PhD and MotherhoodI've accidentally become a feminist scholar. It happened in the early stages of pregnancy, when I was so tired I couldn't keep my eyes open in the library. It happened when I brought my 9 week old baby to a conference and had to spend every coffee break breastfeeding and pumping (simultaneously) instead of networking. It happened when I realized that I'm still doing most of the domestic work even on days when I work outside the home (the so-called 'second shift') and that I have to get up with the baby all night whether I work the next day or not. As a married couple, we're about as first-world, middle class, egalitarian and liberal as they get, yet these inequalities are still there.<br />
<br />
My students and colleagues from China have also really opened my eyes to the need for feminism. The first time I met one of my MA students, she said "I heard you were married--wow, that's great!" as if I had accomplished something really remarkable. (Also, who's telling students my marital status? Haha!) When I announced my pregnancy to a Chinese friend, he was very happy for me and said that in China, a woman is considered "complete" once she has a baby. Yikes...I knew it was meant well, but it seemed to discount other achievements. To be honest, I don't think of marriage or motherhood as an achievement. Marriage can't be considered an accomplishment when the divorce rate is so high, and having kids can't be considered an accomplishment when teen pregnancy rates are so high.<br />
<br />
That said, motherhood impacts your career like no other life choice. It's well documented in the literature that having children impacts women's careers in academia. "Women who have children soon after receiving their PhD are much less likely to achieve tenure than men who have children at the same point in their career" (Williams, 2005, p. 91). It's unusual for PhD moms to completely stay at home, though---this <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/05/07/opting-out-about-10-of-highly-educated-moms-are-staying-at-home/" target="_blank">Pew study</a> found only 6% of mothers with PhDs are opting out of the workforce. The most common path seems to be the one of non-tenure track and part-time positions, like my temporary part-time contract. It works for my family situation at the moment, but I would love to have a full-time position (and I'll continue looking for one in the meantime).<br />
<br />
Balancing my new responsibilities is tough, but parenthood isn't the terribly difficult ordeal that so much comedy makes it out to be. Really. The hard parts--childbirth, sleepless nights, cleaning up bodily fluids, etc.--are just a normal part of the job description. We knew what we were getting ourselves into, and we can't complain because we chose to do it. Our parents did it for us and now it's our turn to do it for the next generation. It really doesn't have to be so awful!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-mD-kDHLuVa-LrW842zpbeI0OYL7I2zjCin3lrMX63P8zD_mM_u25JxFUJIGSbQHoZ445O4J8rjUFCp4weEv8kmLp-onvdWW86xyJR7NJfDtkDFbwagnLcAWx3BFRJk_c5AbHGq0ozH0/s1600/d3da7eb6742433f5910cb36fbca8d0c8.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-mD-kDHLuVa-LrW842zpbeI0OYL7I2zjCin3lrMX63P8zD_mM_u25JxFUJIGSbQHoZ445O4J8rjUFCp4weEv8kmLp-onvdWW86xyJR7NJfDtkDFbwagnLcAWx3BFRJk_c5AbHGq0ozH0/s320/d3da7eb6742433f5910cb36fbca8d0c8.jpg" width="318" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
It's ok, you don't have to be a tired octopus to be a good parent.</div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhil9xGwa6Z03Fn-DlL5YAJWxSFr1z5IoiF3cj1QqQbHtQSvLsJ0ZHv-e6_2e5NHj5P9b2B-d2xKIN44_ani-RslbXEGohovmKGY2ca20M_X_MWOg_xCqKfxiK76a1O7XpqJS56G4RKahk/s1600/funny-parenting-ecards-someecards-311__700.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="216" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhil9xGwa6Z03Fn-DlL5YAJWxSFr1z5IoiF3cj1QqQbHtQSvLsJ0ZHv-e6_2e5NHj5P9b2B-d2xKIN44_ani-RslbXEGohovmKGY2ca20M_X_MWOg_xCqKfxiK76a1O7XpqJS56G4RKahk/s320/funny-parenting-ecards-someecards-311__700.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqqjB4lwGzeiaixd1DxoXRR-i2wcG-GEPZd2c1bWe0lgGq6IqWOORMb-aaTH90hm6wZ9T1NH9VSfAb_AOBetfAJCaVh81nwcd4mN_kfkbqu4EkA-TRIfNp-Dkmh-ZZAzD_U8JmTUyWCS8/s1600/Funny-Parenting-Quotes-6.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="201" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqqjB4lwGzeiaixd1DxoXRR-i2wcG-GEPZd2c1bWe0lgGq6IqWOORMb-aaTH90hm6wZ9T1NH9VSfAb_AOBetfAJCaVh81nwcd4mN_kfkbqu4EkA-TRIfNp-Dkmh-ZZAzD_U8JmTUyWCS8/s320/Funny-Parenting-Quotes-6.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Humor like this perpetuates the damaging, sexist "mommy brain" stereotype</div>
<br />
<br />
Besides, there are definitely more ups than downs. He makes me smile and laugh every single day and I love watching him grow and learn new skills, and seeing his personality starting to take shape. The film "Inside Out" really influenced my thinking about parenting, actually--I was watching it on a flight while holding my sleeping 10-week old, and I kept thinking about how his experiences are going to shape him, just as my childhood shaped me. It's a lot of pressure, of course, to think that you're responsible for building your kid's mental "Goofball Island" and "Family Island", but it's a pretty amazing thing, too.<br />
<br />
I'm just not sure how we can ever resolve the "second shift" and tenure-track problems, though...Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-80954225688091224012016-03-07T07:46:00.001-08:002016-03-07T07:46:11.522-08:00Teaching reflectionsNow that I'm on the other side of the student-teacher dyad, I've realized that my teachers always knew when I wasn't giving them my best work. All through school, I really thought that I'd pulled it off--the term papers written the night before the deadline, the projects thrown together after weeks of procrastination, the MA dissertation that I wrote in about 3 weeks--I thought I had them fooled because my grades were decent. But now that I've had a student do it to me, submit something well below what he/she is capable of, I realize that they must have seen through me, too. I really felt disappointed (even slightly insulted--did he/she think I couldn't tell it had been carelessly thrown together?) and had a hard time figuring out how to word my feedback. In the end, I kept it brief and gave specific instructions for our next meeting. Let's move on and pretend that weak effort didn't happen--just make it better next time.<br />
<br />
Overall I loved my extended student years and I don't regret much, but I do regret not consistently giving my best. I used to try harder for teachers I liked, for example, or for subjects that I liked better than others. In practice, this meant I gave brilliant book reports in AP Spanish literature while I scored a one (failing grade) on the AP Calculus exam. In my first term at UW, I scraped through linguistics with a TA I didn't like and I aced a history of science elective with a lovely British professor.<br />
<br />
What if I'm teaching the class the student doesn't like? What if I'm the teacher they don't like? How do I get them to do their best work while also staying likable and approachable? This is much more reflective experience than I ever thought it would be. I love working with students again, and it's teaching me a lot about education & life in general.<br />
<br />
In other news, today I've submitted an abstract for a<a href="https://www.york.ac.uk/sociology/research/groups/cpac/" target="_blank"> symposium at University of York</a>. My proposed paper is on the political impacts of study abroad participation. I got quite into it when I was coming up with the abstract so I'm going to turn it into an actual research project, whether or not it gets accepted for the symposium. I was recently rejected for the Oxford Junior Research Fellowship and a Sheffield postdoc position, so I've been meaning to come up with a new research project proposal and this one sounds quite interesting so far.Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-39109048088017995932016-02-15T03:27:00.000-08:002016-02-15T03:27:09.270-08:00Students as CustomersLast Monday I went to Brotherton library with my new staff card and read academic literature, taking proper notes and everything, for the first time in ages. It was wonderful. There's something about having less time that really makes you take advantage of the limited time you do have. In my student days, my attention would wander and I'd get distracted from my reading, because I had little else to do that day. Now, my 2-hour trip to the library is the only time I have to go there, and I needed to get some reading done because I knew it would be my only chance all week (and it has been--I checked out 3 books and haven't looked at them again since!). I was more focused than I had been in years!<br />
<br />
Another reason for this improved attention span and dedication to my work is that my free time now costs real money. Going to the library means paying somebody else to look after George, and my one day a week of childcare costs £48. I have to make the most of that time and get as much done as possible to make it worthwhile. It's costing me a lot to study now, which got me thinking about our students under the new £9,000/year fees.<br />
<br />
Over the past couple of years, since the £9k tuition fee was introduced, there's been a noticeable increase in the 'student as customer' mentality. It's prevalent amongst students, their parents, higher education administrators, and even some educators. Students demand more when they think of themselves as customers. They want course readings to be scanned as PDFs instead of having to find them in the library, they want lectures to be recorded and put online (along with the powerpoint slides), and most significantly, they don't want to study any material that won't be assessed. The other day on the bus, I overheard a student complaining to a friend, "I wish they would just teach us what's on the exam." I wanted to say something, but didn't know where to start...<br />
<br />
In America, the mentality of student-customers has been around for many years. It's not all bad--I've seen it used to encourage attendance, in fact. Some professors remind their students that each lecture is costing them $100+, so they'd better attend in order to get their money's worth. If only our students looked at it that way, rather than demanding customer satisfaction...Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-70040195084411427872015-10-19T09:01:00.002-07:002015-10-19T09:01:36.817-07:00PrivilegeWhen I started my research, I essentially was interested in what others like me had experienced--what did other Americans think about their time spent studying overseas? How did it change their lives? I thought the case of Americans in Britain was particularly interesting, because of the "special relationship", common language, shared culture, etc. How are the experiences of Americans different from other international students, those who don't speak English as a native language, those who may not "blend in" as well as Americans (particularly white Americans)? For example, on my first day in the UK as an exchange student, I got asked for directions. When I said what I thought the right answer was, and explained it was my first time here, too, they said "Oh, sorry, you looked like you knew what you were doing!" During my time in the UK, I've been asked for directions countless times in London, Liverpool, Bath, Manchester, Leeds, etc. I blend in--I "pass" for a local until I open my mouth. I'm privileged to pass, and now that I've been here for so many years and finished my research, I've finally recognised that privilege.<br />
<br />
One of my more academic insights into parenting (almost 4 months now!) has been that I want George to acknowledge his privilege. He is white, male, a dual citizen of the US and the UK, born to married, home-owning parents who both hold postgraduate degrees. He has a passport and has already used it. When he learns to speak, it will be in English, giving him an advantage in the international job market. His first-rate medical care has been provided by the internationally renowned NHS since before he was born. He is incredibly privileged (not part of the 1% or anything, but still, very privileged). I want him to know that these things are completely up to chance, and he could have just as easily been born in Syria. He could have been born a girl in a culture that doesn't value them, and gone without medical care or an education simply due to being a girl. He could have been born into a single parent situation, as his parents both were, or a lower middle-class family without health insurance in America, as I was. He could have been born another race and faced discrimination simply based on the colour of his skin.<br />
<br />
As a parent, you walk a fine line between wanting the best for your children and trying not to spoil them. Statistically, he's already spoilt from day 1. I want the best for him, but I also desperately want to teach him to use his privilege for good in the world. He has a voice that many people don't have, simply because of the color of his skin, his sex and his nationality. I hope he uses it well. (Very heavy expectations for a kid that can't even roll over yet, but there you go!)Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-55633279212260274142015-09-28T01:19:00.004-07:002015-09-28T01:19:39.299-07:00Fulbright Legacy ConferenceOn 1-2 Sept, I attended a brilliant <a href="http://blaircenter.uark.edu/8247.php" target="_blank">conference</a> at the University of Arkansas:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><i>J. William Fulbright in International Perspective: Liberal Internationalism and U.S. Global Influence</i></span><br />
<br />
I'd been looking forward to this one for a long time--not only is the topic a perfect fit for my research, but there are a lot of names amongst the organizers and attendees that I couldn't wait to meet. I was hoping to get some good ideas for my book revisions, too. I'm ashamed that I haven't submitted my manuscript to the publishers yet, but at the same time, this was a great opportunity to get more final bits and pieces to add!<br />
<br />
In the subtopics on the call for papers there were two bits that jumped out at me-- "particular southern variants of mid-century internationalism[;] racial,
class, and gender aspects of liberal internationalism or the Fulbright
exchange program". For my paper, I combined the specific concern with the South and the subtopic of gender aspects of the exchange program, and looked into Southern attitudes towards women's education, and connected these ideas to the Fulbright Program.<br />
<br />
I started working on the paper over a year ago, after submitting the PhD but before my viva. Having something new to work on during that awkward downtime really inspired me and got me excited about research again. It turned out to be quite a big topic with a lot of different aspects that I hadn't considered--the social and economic hierarchical structures in the South, the highly variable curriculum at different women's higher education institutions, the experiences of Southern women at Northern women's colleges, the foreign and domestic activities of Fulbright participants' wives and children as an example of the multiplier effect, the contributions of Fulbright women in academia, women as exchange program administrators, etc. So many different angles and subtopics I had to discard! It's certainly original, too--there's been very little done at all on race or gender in educational exchanges.<br />
<br />
The "Southern Belle Paradox," a term I borrow from historian Christie Anne Farnham's excellent book, <i>The Education of the Southern Belle</i>, is the idea that the antebellum South was home to pioneering efforts in women's education, yet these young ladies were educated primarily with the aim of marrying well. There is a juxtaposition of progressive attitudes towards women's education and conservative attitudes towards their place in a patriarchal social structure. The first full women's college in the United States was founded in Macon, Georgia in 1837--thirty years (and more) before the well-known Northern women's colleges, the Seven Sisters to the Ivy League, were established. Southern women's colleges often offered a curriculum equal to that of men's colleges--Latin, mathematics, natural sciences, etc. Many of them were far from the stereotype of 'finishing schools'. Yet when you look at the reasoning behind their curriculum, they no longer seem progressive--women were given this level of education not to compete with men, but to be their companions. The Southern belle strove to be 'fascinating,' to be able to provide intelligent conversation to her future husband. It's a bit like the geisha idea, though perhaps not quite as submissive. Education also maintained the hierarchy of Southern society, setting the upper class young women above the uneducated lower classes, both whites and slaves.<br />
<br />
Connecting this concept to the Fulbright Program--my main argument is that both feature an appreciation for the social and cultural capital that education endows, rather than seeing education as a vocational prep activity. Senator Fulbright originally excluded medical students from the program and emphasised the liberal arts and humanities. He saw his program as being more about forging connections and understanding between people of different nationalities, rather than simply paying for a participant's professional development. The connection isn't that strong or relevant, though, so I'm planning on quite a lot of revising before the paper is considered for the conference publication next year. There hasn't been any research on gender and the Fulbright Program, so at any rate, my work is original and there are a lot of new angles to explore in my revisions!<br />
<br />
Just before the conference, I found a modern day version of the Southern Belle Paradox in the news. There's been a trend of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-34042751" target="_blank">female medical students in Pakistan</a> who become doctors, but never actually practice medicine--they get the degree for the social capital and improved marriage prospects. So interesting that women's education still has these progressive-meets-conservative features!Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8189335746199779246.post-25098137041869870012015-08-21T06:09:00.001-07:002015-08-21T06:09:12.477-07:00Back in the Saddle Again<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2GTsdj1s4sAbRaiKiBhrNMft1w4RwlI6FuTelMMFaG73WXrWOAfZAoWNDkPaGWoSh0so9tTpnVrSZDeLng5wJwkYE7Sa1mtcJ5TfA4h1NixhX9dFJWkBqZSuyVmNV4wvZnWaFH-O-Ft0/s1600/phd+grad.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="480" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2GTsdj1s4sAbRaiKiBhrNMft1w4RwlI6FuTelMMFaG73WXrWOAfZAoWNDkPaGWoSh0so9tTpnVrSZDeLng5wJwkYE7Sa1mtcJ5TfA4h1NixhX9dFJWkBqZSuyVmNV4wvZnWaFH-O-Ft0/s640/phd+grad.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
Life Goals Accomplished: Married, PhD and Baby by 30</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
I told myself I would take six months off of thinking about work after the baby arrived, but I started working on my writing again after about six weeks. Our little George Pierre is lovely and I'm so grateful to have this time at home with him. It's wonderful to see him develop and change day by day--his latest trick is smiling and he has such a sweet little gummy grin. I can't imagine leaving him at daycare at this young age, and I know I'm really lucky to be a stay at home mom. Old habits die hard, though, and I'm already feeling guilty for not being employed or in school (somehow I didn't feel as bad about it while pregnant, but I did have a part-time marketing gig with the international office, so I was technically employed then). It's part of being driven and goal-oriented--the qualities that have helped me succeed are also the same ones that make me feel guilty when I'm not pushing myself to full capacity. Instead of taking a break and celebrating my accomplishments (PhD and baby), I'm already stressing about the next goals (publications, fellowships, career). It's not fair to myself or to the baby, really.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Baby George is eight weeks today, and currently napping in his bouncer seat--now that he's sleeping a bit better these days, I'm going to try to get back to blogging at least, as a gentle way of thinking about my research again. If J.K. Rowling could write <i>Harry Potter</i> with her sleeping baby beside her, I can update this blog more frequently!</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
A couple of quick PD-related thoughts:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
1) US Election</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
I watched some of the Republican primary debate last night and am embarrassed by the way the U.S. election system looks to the rest of the world. Firstly, the election is over a year away. Politicians will likely change their positions and sound bite lines a dozen times between now and election day, so why is Fox News holding debates at this early stage? (Putting aside the obvious answer that it's Fox News...It's too early, even for Fox News to be doing this!) </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Secondly, the front runner at the moment is Donald Trump. Really. His comments on immigration (build a wall?) and women are ignorant, populist and far right-wing. If you criticize his statements, he says the problem with America is that we're too concerned with being politically correct, and he refuses to be politically correct. No, Trump, it's not political correctness, it's common decency and respect for people who aren't white men--immigrants, people of color, women, LGBTQ, etc. He's like an exaggerated version of Nigel Farage. I know he won't get elected, but the fact he's doing well in the polls (even temporarily) is so disheartening for me to watch. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Thirdly, Jeb Bush looked and sounded like a viable candidate. He's currently in second place and is probably going to have the staying power and electability that populist Trump lacks. But what is the world going to think of America if the 2016 race is between a Bush and a Clinton? During the 2008 primaries, I went to Obama's rally with some of my exchange student friends from Germany and the UK, and I remember even then some of them commenting that they preferred Obama because having another President Clinton would be too dynastic. If both parties opt to continue these dynasties, the 2016 election is going to look ridiculous.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
2) My friend Caitlin shared this piece from the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/combating-a-digital-caliphate/2015/07/17/1045d716-2bf5-11e5-a250-42bd812efc09_story.html" target="_blank">Washington Post</a> yesterday on the US State Department's online counterterrorism efforts. It raises some very interesting points about the nature of Islamic State's online recruitment. Rather than use centralized messaging, they crowd-source their efforts--individuals spread propaganda on Twitter, sometimes with help from automatic systems that allow them to post thousands of tweets. The State Department's campaign, on the other hand, is able to tweet only a few authorized messages to counter these thousands of IS messages. Jane Harman also points out that the State Department often jumps into online conversations where it is uninvited and unwelcome, rather than using the subtle infiltration of ideas that characterized past efforts. She urges the U.S. to consider using a networked approach to counterterrorism messaging:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
"When top-down government approaches are flawed, then bottom-up,
grassroots organizing is an obvious next try. The government still has
skin in the game — dollars and cents, and, more important, convening
power and information-sharing — that can make these public-private
partnerships work. But it needs to lead from behind. Get religious
leaders, political consultants and tech firms in the same room, then
step back. This is a community effort and an American effort — the feds
aren’t the right face for it."</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
I especially like her idea of working with the tech firms. From a civil liberties stand-point, firms like Google and Facebook already know far too much about people for their own purposes (profiting off of targeted advertising). Wouldn't it be worthwhile to get them on board, to use their vast data to help the State Department target messages that promote moderate, mainstream Islam and denounce extremism? Better yet, remove the State Department by another degree and use religious leaders and community members to construct these messages, increasing their credibility. The digital age is introducing new opportunities and platforms as well as new challenges. </div>
Molly Bettiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04040495812780926852noreply@blogger.com0